So I’m an armchair tech geek and, when I can, listen to the This is my next podcast at the end of each week. Most of the interim site’s team—they’re soon launching its replacement, The Verge, in partnership with SB Nation—defected in April from tech blog Engadget. (Read David Carr’s rundown for The New York Timeshere.)
Last week, toward the end of episode 22, Paul Miller, Vlad Savov, Joanna Stern and Joshua Topolsky found themselves here after talking about wireless carriers (I don’t have any comments or responses, it just struck me as a super-Zeitgeisty exchange worth sharing):
VS: We want the benefits of a monopoly, one network spread across the entire country, but we don’t want one company to be in charge of it. If it’s not going to be one company, one carrier, it basically has to be the government. There’s no other option, [no other] choice.
JT: What about a supercompany? Like a really, really big company.
VS: You [American] guys are all really afraid of your government and at the same time, you’ve all benefited from government initiatives to a great degree, which you don’t really appreciate. One quick example being the lunar landing, right?
JS: Oh, God.
PM: You can’t…we cannot go down this…
JT: No, I like it. Vlad, I’d like to hear your perspective as a sophisticated and advanced European. I love it.
VS: Seriously: The lunar landing was the result of vast amounts of government investment, and it was to compete with the Russians.
JT: You know what we need? We need Russians. Read More…
Easily the most contentious performance I’ve witnessed since Young Jean Lee’s The Shipment—which played the same house last March—EMPIRE (Art & Politics), at the MCA Stage October 2 and 3, has stewed restlessly in the minds of everyone I know who’s seen it. Reductively assessed, it’s a snowballing extrapolation of two early lines: In voiceover while we take in four opening tableaux—two of which are a bare-breasted woman hoisting a French flag and a couple playing cards*—actor Davis Freeman thunders, “What’s the secret behind this card game? What lies are being told that will never make it into our history books?” Moments later, that couple, dressed in gorgeous Napoleonic era costumes by Sabine Debonnets and Odile Hautemulle, ends their game, the woman victorious.
“I won,” she says contentedly, putting down her hand. “Now: What shall it be?”
The remaining hour and a half of European performance collective Superamas’s latest show suggests that this woman, like the winner of any battle, epic or tiny, can choose anything she wants.
Photo by Giannina Urmeneta Ottiker, courtesy the Museum of Contemporary Art.
Through cinematic use of lighting and sound effects, a deranged and slapstick, Cliffs Notes reenactment of the Battle of Aspern-Essling follows. In one short scene, a black soldier is humiliated with racist jokes (his captors dance around like monkeys), then executed by firing squad. Another begins with a torrid but consensual three-way tryst which, when interrupted, becomes a hideously cartoonish pair of rapes. Later, all the soldiers die, one by one, until the stage is littered with bodies. (Some of this is soundtracked with Wagner and Offenbach, some of it by Godspeed You! Black Emperor and Michael Jackson). Enter a movie camera on a motorized dolly, recording the carnage with a floodlight to Patti Smith’s cover of “Pastime Paradise.”
It’s a film set, you see, and the actors soon reappear, freshened up in elegant contemporary clothes (also gorgeous, by Alix Eynaudi) to mingle, and celebrate the production with some sabered Champagne at a party for unappealing people. One is a naïve, privileged college student and daughter of the host, a smug and self-satisfied, flirtatious French ambassador named Philippe Dupraz. Innocuous tropical lounge music plays, what you hear in the lobby of a W Hotel, but the fête’s mood is threatened when a token guest, a political refugee, recounts terrible tales of the Somali turmoil that keeps him from his homeland and what remains of his family. The gravity of his story is hastily ignored, or whitewashed by the others’ transparent lack of ability (and willingness) to relate.
Giant light fixtures, white globes suggesting planets given monochromatic paint jobs, hover motionless over the action. The camera remains always, flanked by a sound technician wielding a boom microphone. (Three or four conversations might happen simultaneously, but only one at a time is chosen for the record. What lies are being told that will never make it into our history books? Also, this skeleton camera crew can interact with Freeman’s American character while the rest of the cast is caught in a freeze frame. In more than one respect, a quote by David Lynch does not come from nowhere, and there’s a healthy splash of Cronenberg in there, too.) Read More…
After a year of failed attempts to get my computer and camcorder to speak to one another, Apple rolled out new drivers or something and now the two won’t shut up.
A pair of little movies has emerged from the pile of DV tapes I’ll be working through for the next year or so: Calcetines, and Three’s Company (read about my process for the piece here and here) after the jump. More to come on my channel at Vimeo as they wrap. Enjoy.
I met Perron in February at a talk at Northwestern University, “What is Dance Journalism?” Many of the points she made then about the changing media landscape were forward-looking and in touch. As a Dance Magazine reader since the age of five, it was very interesting to hear where the publication was headed, straight from the top.
Which is why I’ve been scratching my head.
In the post, she describes self-publishing online about the creative process as “an annoying new trend,” followed by the caveat that she is “not talking about Tere O’Connor, who writes very considered contemplations about dance making, based on his decades of experience.”
I am talking about young choreographers, anxious to be in the public eye, who think that writing about what happened that day in the studio will somehow 1) bring them a wider audience and/or 2) make them a better choreographer.
To her first point: When we’re talking about young choreographers, “a wider audience” often means “people besides friends and family.” Emerging choreographers often don’t pay their dancers, don’t pay themselves, have no internal or external marketing support and, on top of these limitations, may create in a community where there are no working dance writers and/or no publications covering local, small scale dance projects. If there are working dance writers in the area, and venues in which their articles are published, coverage is almost assuredly confined — I can explain if needed — to established companies producing known work.
Sarah A. O. Rosner, left, and Rowan Magee in rehearsal at BARN in Queens.
Sarah A. O. Rosner’s press contact dropped me a line shortly before I headed to New York last week, wondering if I’d be interested in stopping by a rehearsal. The A. O. Movement Collective’s latest, 90 Ways to Wake from Drowning, premieres at Joyce SoHo this weekend, Friday 30 and Saturday 31. Tickets are moving fast — a Saturday matinée was added to absorb some demand.
I encourage you folks out there to catch this work.
Granted, I didn’t see much at BARN — just an hour or so of tweaks to two duets between Rowan Magee and Ilona Bito — but I enjoyed watching Rosner observe and offer notes on the material. Even when tuning highly physical vocabulary (Bito spent a lot of time upside down), Rosner uses language more like a theater director’s to coax out the environment she’s looking for. It showed in the way the pair’s slow wrestle seemed more like an impassioned discussion in movement than a pas de deux. Rosner’s work isn’t about using dance to represent life; you instead feel like you’re observing interactions within a community that speaks through bodily contact. This strikes a chord of authenticity in solid dialogue with how dance as an art form works, and anchors the more angst-ridden moments, which could become indulgent, to real emotional bedrock.
(Apologies in advance for my sprawling, disorganized assessment of this piece. On the other hand, if you haven’t or can’t see it, reading this review might give a sense of the experience.)
Time Out New York Dance editor Gia Kourlas, writing in the New York Times, wondered whether Tony award-winning choreographer Bill T. Jones is or should be considering a move from dance to theater. Her query was prompted by Fondly Do We Hope…Fervently Do We Pray, which received its world premiere last fall at Ravinia and has been reborn, “tightened significantly,” for New York’s Lincoln Center Festival. (In 2007, Ravinia commissioned the Bill T. Jones/Arnie Zane Dance Company to create an original work for the bicentennial of Abraham Lincoln’s birth, and were returned a trilogy over three years. Fondly Do We Hope is the final installment.)
I’ll second Kourlas’s query, and without a memory-jogging sift through my drawer of ticket stubs, add that I’ve never before seen a dance so thoroughly drenched with language. The spoken and sung lyrics of its score are pulled from the Bible, 19th century and contemporary sources; singers and some dancers speak text from same and a script by Jones and Janet Wong. Moments without some sort of voiceover are rare. Buttressing the verbiage is a three-page program note by Suzanne Carbonneau, relevant source material reprinted in full, words projected on the set, and a statement by Jones himself.
Jones, of course, can do whatever he wants. In contemporary performance—hell, in contemporary culture—genre distinctions are vague at best. But upon exiting the Rose Theater, feeling like I’d just read a novella, I wondered what dance had to do with any of it. The physical language created by Jones and his collaborators is beautifully executed and compelling, but comes nowhere near the way it defined character in, say, his 2006 work Chapel/Chapter—knowing Jones is capable of great dance theater makes Fondly Do We Hope that much more frustrating. Read More…
Any opinion expressed here is solely that of the author or commenter. No content on this blog may be assumed to represent the opinions of Time Out Chicago, SeeChicagoDance, Windy City Media Group, Flavorpill, or any other print or online publication to which I contribute.
If you have authored content linked to or media copied on this site and do not wish for it to be here, contact me and I will remove it immediately.